Competition for breeding sites and site‐dependent population regulation in a highly colonial seabird, the common guillemot Uria aalge
By Hanna Kokko, M. Harris, Sarah Wanless. 2004
178 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7f8427401d7c218b26732a1e80a5edf020ac542
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- J. Donázar
- J. Tella
- Manuel Guillermo Forero
- F. Hiraldo
- M. Carrete
- F. Sergio
- Vincenzo Penteriani
- J. Blas
Citations in the corpus
- Floater strategies and dynamics in birds, and their importance in conservation biology: towards an understanding of nonbreeders in avian populations (2011, background): “In this case a former floater that had acquired (and then lost) the status of a territory owner may return to floater status as it searches for new breeding opportunities (Kokko et al., 2004).”
- Components of breeding performance in two competing species: habitat heterogeneity, individual quality and density‐dependence (2006, background): “…low quality individuals to sites of progressive lower suitability (Fretwell and Lucas 1970, Rodenhouse et al. 1997, Newton 1998, Pä rt 2001, Kokko et al. 2004), most studies concentrate just on one of these topics, i.e. habitat or individual quality, or the available data do not allow the…”
- Spatial ecology and conservation of seabirds facing global climate change: a review (2009, background): “Moreover, competition for sites, density dependence effects on breeding success and the mere attraction conspecifics are other key processes involving individual behaviour that need to be considered and that can complicate observed patterns (Kokko et al. 2004, Oro et al. 2006).”
- Sequential settlement and site dependence in a migratory raptor (2007, background): “For example, Hawkins and Berryman (2000) remarked that preemption is but a form of contest competition for good-quality sites, whereas for Kokko et al. (2004), site dependence implies that one individual relegates another to a lower quality site through preemption, which still qualifies as an…”