Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements

By L. Mikhailov. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 2003

622 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/799083421cff839fb5b0b5685327737b8d0081a3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

1. Dongling Xu
2. David Hasin
3. Golam Kabir
4. Yingming Wang
5. Ali Emrouznejad
6. Malcolm John Beynon
7. Yueh-Hsiang Chen
8. Bakhtiar Feizizadeh

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Dongling Xu
2. Jianbo Yang
3. Yingming Wang
4. David Hasin
5. Golam Kabir
6. Ali Emrouznejad
7. Bakhtiar Feizizadeh
8. Thomas Blaschke

In Statistics and Probability

1. Jianbo Yang
2. Dongling Xu
3. Yingming Wang
4. David Hasin
5. Golam Kabir
6. Malcolm John Beynon
7. Yueh-Hsiang Chen
8. Bakhtiar Feizizadeh

Citations in the corpus

• Application of SAW, TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS models in cultivation priority planning for maize, rapeseed and soybean crops (2018, background): “in case the evaluations were inhomogeneous; the minimum and maximum operations will be not appropriate) (Mikhailov, 2003).”
• A two-stage logarithmic goal programming method for generating weights from interval comparison matrices (2005, methodology): “Mikhailov [26–28] developed a fuzzy preference programming (FPP) method to derive crisp priorities from interval or fuzzy comparison matrices and extended the method to the case of group decision making.”
• Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (2004, methodology): “Similar linear formulations of the prioritisation problem are given in [12,13].”
• COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF AHP AND FUZZY AHP M ODELS FOR M ULTICRITERIA INVENTORY CLASSIFICATION (2011, methodology): “…geometric mean method (Buckley, 1985), the direct fuzzification of the method of Csutora and Buckley (2001), synthetic extend analysis (Chang, 1996), Mikhailov’s fuzzy preference programming (Mikhailov, 2003) and two-stage logarithmic programming (Wang et al., 2005) are some of these methods.”
• Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection (2007, methodology): “Mikhailov proposed the FPP method [4-6] to derive priority vectors from a set of crisp or interval comparisons.”
• Application and Development of a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process within a Capital Investment Study (2005, methodology): “The family of fuzzy AHP –FAHP techniques developed all undertake pairwise comparisons, but may or not may adhere to the Saaty based analytic process (see Buckley et al., 2001; Mikhailov, 2003).”
• The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis (2017, background): “He contributed to the debate on deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgments (Mikhailov, 2003).”
• GIS-multicriteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia lake basin, Iran (2012, methodology): “In this particular landslide analysis for Urmia lake basin, the criteria were represented by separate GIS dataset layers with memberships of different potential classes and were subsequently standardized using the maximum eigenvectors approach on a 0–1 scale.”
• Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning (2015, background): “The popular AHP-based land-use suitability analyses have been criticized for their need for exact numerical values to express the strength of stakeholders’ preferences (Deng, 1999; Mikhailov, 2003; Chang et al., 2008;Wang & Chen, 2008; Kordi & Brandt 2012; Mosadeghi et al., 2012).”