Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
By L. Mikhailov, Petco E. Tsvetinov. Applied Soft Computing, 2004
467 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1a482324d37b861fa647236abc2bd2a6aa5b68b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sladjana Benković
- Claudia M. Eckert
- Orlando Durán
- Boris Delibasic
- T. Stewart
- Nilsen Karakasoglu
- Yan Liu
- Ksenija Mandic
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Sladjana Benković
- Claudia M. Eckert
- Orlando Durán
- Boris Delibasic
- T. Stewart
- Nilsen Karakasoglu
- Yan Liu
- Ksenija Mandic
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Sladjana Benković
- Claudia M. Eckert
- Orlando Durán
- Boris Delibasic
- T. Stewart
- Nilsen Karakasoglu
- Yan Liu
- Ksenija Mandic
Citations in the corpus
- Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis (2012, methodology): “[97,98] uses a preference programming formulation to maximize the consistency of judgements and the possibility of those judgements.”
- Analysis of the financial parameters of Serbian banks through the application of the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods (2014, methodology): “The fuzzy AHP method (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process — FAHP) has been suggested by various authors (Buckley, 1985; Chang, 1996; Mikhailov and Tsvetinov, 2004; Van Laarhoven and Pedrcyz, 1983).”
- Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods (2009, methodology): “Mikhailov and Tsvetinov (2004) applied a new fuzzy modification of the AHP for evaluating services .”
- A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements (2020, methodology): “Chen and Yang (2011) use Mikhailov (2004)’s method to examine the consistency.”
- An Integrated Decision-Making Model for Transformer Condition Assessment Using Game Theory and Modified Evidence Combination Extended by D Numbers (2016, background): “However, in many practical applications, such as condition assessment of transformers, expert objective predilection may be fuzzy [21], and the experts may not be willing to provide exact values for pair comparisons [22].”
- Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a Fuzzy-AHP approach (2008, methodology): “There are a number of procedures to perform the ranking process (Buckley, 1985; Mikhailov & Tsvetinov, 2004), among them we propose the utilization of the representative method, which is given by the following relation: where A = ( a 1 , a 2 , a 3 ) is a triangular number and b A represents the…”