Effects of suppression and release on sapling growth for 11 tree species of northern, interior British Columbia

By British Columbia., E. Wright, Charles D. Canham. 2000

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/795d7c0f339e7a573c4d3640dfea4ee85f09417e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

A NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS OF TREE GROWTH AND SURVIVAL IN A HURRICANE‐DRIVEN TROPICAL FOREST (2004, background): “For Alchornea latifolia, an alternate November 2004 607SPATIAL ANALYSIS TREE GROWTH AND SURVIVAL model that simply differentiated between conspecific and heterospecific competitors was the most parsimonious (Table 4).”
Effects of size, competition and altitude on tree growth (2007, background): “…unlikely to bear much resemblance to a scaling function because trees may spend long periods of time suppressed in deep shade followed by relatively brief interludes of fast growth in high light when openings are created above them by tree-fall events (e.g. Uhl & Murphy 1981; Wright et al. 2000).”
Light-growth responses of coastal Douglas-fir and western redcedar saplings under different regimes of soil moisture and nutrients (2001, background): “…including genetics (Lester et al. 1990; St. Clair and Snieko 1999), mycorrhizal associations (Simard et al. 1997), previous periods of suppression (Wright et al. 2000), disturbance history (Horn 1971), competition for resources (Vitousek et al. 1982), morphological differences (Chen et al. 1996;…”
Above‐ versus below‐ground competitive effects and responses of a guild of temperate tree species (2009, background): “When released, they still showed relatively low growth rates, leading us to interpret what are likely to have been the effects of past suppression (Wright et al. 2000) as low potential growth rates.”
A spatially explicit model of sapling growth in a tropical forest: does the identity of neighbours matter? (2004, background): “Studies in temperate forests have shown that these historical lags can account for a large proportion of variation in growth (Wright et al. 2000).”
A neighborhood analysis of canopy tree competition : effects of shading versus crowding (2004, background): “An earlier study of the effects of suppression on juvenile tree growth demonstrated that saplings of hemlock and redcedar did not show effects of the length of past suppression on growth once they were released in canopy gaps (Wright et al. 2000).”
Modelling silvicultural alternatives for conifer regeneration in boreal mixedwood stands (aspen/white spruce/balsam fir) (2002, background): “Wright et al. (2000) suggest fir and spruce will release after extended periods (10–40 years) of suppression: subalpine fir responded quickly to increased light while the response of spruce was more gradual.”