Above‐ versus below‐ground competitive effects and responses of a guild of temperate tree species

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evaluating tree competition indices as predictors of basal area increment in western Montana forests (2011, background): “Studies including explicit estimates of the amount of light intercepted by competitors have shown improved growth predictions (i.e., Canham et al., 2004; Coates et al., 2009).”
Competition and tree crowns: a neighborhood analysis of three boreal tree species. (2010, methodology): “, 2004a) but studies that estimate a for several species often find a wide range of parameter estimates (Uriarte et al., 2004a; Papaik and Canham, 2006; Coates et al., 2009).”
Response of sugar maple (Acer saccharum, Marsh.) tree crown structure to competition in pure versus mixed stands (2016, background): “) tree is an efficient competitor in the forests of western Canada, as it has a very high crown extinction coefficient (Coates et al., 2009).”