Gap‐crossing decisions of forest birds in a fragmented landscape

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Frequent bird movements across a highly fragmented landscape: the role of species traits and forest matrix (2013, background): “…radio tagged or translocated one or a few bird species to follow their individual movements in tropical and temperate systems (e.g. Graham, 2001; Gobeil & Villard, 2002; Sekercioglu et al., 2007; Hansbauer et al., 2008, 2010; Robertson & Radford, 2009; Gillies & St Clair, 2010; Lenz et al., 2011).”
The influence of landscape, patch, and within-patch factors on species presence and abundance: a review of focal patch studies (2010, background): “However, this clearly does not apply to all birds, as some species are reluctant to cross small gaps and show altered movement behavior in fragmented landscapes (e.g., Belisle and Desrochers 2002; Robertson and Radford 2009).”
Avifaunal disarray due to a single despotic species (2013, background): “These configurations increase the visibility of approaching birds and reduce the frequency of intruders approaching the territory (Belisle & Desrochers, 2002; Robertson & Radford, 2009).”
The causes of decline of birds of eucalypt woodlands: advances in our knowledge over the last 10 years (2011, background): “Brooker et al. (1999) inWestern Australia and Robertson and Radford (2009) inVictoria found that fairy-wrens (Malurus spp.) and treecreepers, respectively, appeared reluctant to cross gaps of more than ~60m between patches of vegetation.”