Determinants of Efficient Risk Allocation in Privately Financed Public Infrastructure Projects in Australia

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Risk Factors of Public-Private Partnership Projects in China: Comparison between the Water, Power, and Transportation Sectors (2011, background): “The same researcher conducted a previous study (Jin, 2010) which considers the features related to risk allocation in PPP projects, including partners’ risk management routine, partners’ risk management mechanism, partners’ cooperation history, risk management environmental uncertainty, and…”
Cross-country comparisons of key drivers, critical success factors and risk allocation for public-private partnership projects (2015, background): “Moreover, the validity of the indicators was improved by applying PPP data from Australia (Jin, 2010), Tehran (Heravi and Hajihosseini, 2012), and India (Singh and Kalidindi, 2006), which have extensive PPP experiences.”
Conceptual Framework for the Performance Measurement of Public-Private Partnerships (2015, background): “…insights into PPP risk identification and allocation (e.g., Charoenpornpattana and Minato 1999; Wang et al. 2000a, b; Grimsey and Lewis 2002; Thomas et al. 2003; Li et al. 2005b; Xenidis and Angelides 2005a, b; Nisar 2007; Sachs et al. 2007; Jin 2010, 2011; Xu et al. 2010; Chan et al. 2011).”