Explaining Variations in the Effects of Supportive Messages A Dual-Process Framework

By Graham D. Bodie, Brant R. Burleson. 2008

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79190bf1c892ee107c1683408beb40ebef1c2401

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Susanne M. Jones
2. Graham D. Bodie
3. Andrew D. Wolvin
4. Brant R. Burleson
5. Bo Feng
6. Andrew C. High
7. James Price Dillard
8. Christopher C. Gearhart

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Susanne M. Jones
2. Andrew D. Wolvin
3. Brant R. Burleson
4. Graham D. Bodie

In Social Psychology

1. Graham D. Bodie
2. Andrew D. Wolvin
3. Brant R. Burleson
4. Susanne M. Jones
5. Christopher C. Gearhart
6. Tamara D. Afifi
7. Andrew C. High
8. James Price Dillard

Citations in the corpus

• Explaining the Relationships among Supportive Message Quality, Evaluations, and Outcomes: A Dual-Process Approach (2012, methodology): “Detailed features of the dual-process theory of supportive communication, and how it is similar to and different from models of persuasive outcomes, are described elsewhere (Bodie, in press-b; Bodie & Burleson, 2008; Burleson, 2009, 2010).”
• Listening and Human Communication in the 21st Century (2011, background): “An additional line of research relevant to listening and social support is outlined by Bodie and Burleson (2008).”
• Understanding the outcomes of supportive communication: A dual-process approach (2009, unknown): “…research has further complicated matters, indicating that the effects of messages are often contingent on a host of other factors, including aspects of the message source, the message recipient, and the interactional context (see reviews by Bodie & Burleson, 2008; Cutrona, Cohen, & Igram, 1990).”