Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language

By Friedemann Pulvermüller, Luciano Fadiga. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2010

994 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/790083077c1ab7c48003405d5160ded19c01446d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Analysis by Synthesis: A (Re-)Emerging Program of Research for Language and Vision (2010, methodology): “Using electrophysiological techniques, such as EEG and MEG, other investigators (e.g., Pulvermüller et al. 2006; see review by Pulvermüller & Fadiga 2010) have shown that electrophysiological responses localized to motor areas are active remarkably early in the processing stream (say within 200…”
How do forward models work? And why would you want them? (2013, neutral): “For instance, inner slips tend to create words, just like their overt counterparts (Corley et al. 2011; Oppenheim & Dell 2008; 2010), and their distributions resemble overt slips in other ways (Dell 1978; Postma & Noordanus 1996).”
Gestures Enhance Foreign Language Learning (2012, background): “A word is not an abstract entity with a reference in the world; rather, a word is grounded in the perception and action a subject experiences (Kiefer & Spitzer 2001; Vigliocco et al. 2004; Barsalou 2008; Pulvermüller & Fadiga 2010).”
The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. (2011, background): “At the most general level, the claim is made that Broca’s region supports action observation and execution and that its part in language is related to motor-based speech production and comprehension processes (210, 214).”
A Moderate Approach to Embodied Cognitive Science (2012, background): “1 For additional supportive evidence of motor involvement in language understanding, see Pulvermuller and Fadiga (2010), Jirak et al. (2010), and Glenberg and Gallese (2011).”
The cortical dynamics of speaking: present shortcomings and future avenues (2016, background): “…of the motor cortex in speech perception (e.g. Boulenger, Hauk, & Pulvermüller, 2009; D’Ausilio et al., 2009; Hauk, Johnsrude, & Pulvermüller, 2004; Pulvermuller & Fadiga, 2010; Pulvermuller, Moseley, Egorova, Shebani, & Boulenger, 2014; Wilson, Saygin, Sereno, & Iacoboni, 2004) and language…”