Juvenile adaptation to imprisonment: Feelings of safety, autonomy and well-being, and behaviour in prison

By A. M. van der Laan, V. Eichelsheim. 2013

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78f7777eb3d8687fc949a2bdeeed64628017f768

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. K. Beijersbergen
2. Paul Nieuwbeerta
3. Anja Dirkzwager
4. V. Eichelsheim
5. P. H. van der Laan

In General Health Professions

1. Paul Nieuwbeerta

In Sociology and Political Science

1. K. Beijersbergen
2. Paul Nieuwbeerta
3. Anja Dirkzwager
4. V. Eichelsheim
5. P. H. van der Laan
6. Wim Bernasco
7. Arjan A. J. Blokland
8. Alex R. Piquero

Citations in the corpus

• Procedural Justice, Anger, and Prisoners’ Misconduct (2015, result): “Contrary to these studies, Van der Laan and Eichelsheim (2013) have not found an effect of perceived justice on registered aggressive misconduct among juveniles in six Dutch correctional institutions.”
• Reoffending After Release (2016, background): “…effects of procedural justice on prisoners’ behavior, but these studies focused on prisoners’ misconduct during imprisonment (Beijersbergen, Dirkzwager, Eichelsheim, Van der Laan, & Nieuwbeerta, 2015; Liebling, 2004; Reisig & Mesko, 2009; Sparks & Bottoms, 1995; Van der Laan & Eichelsheim, 2013).”