Detecting lies and deceit: the psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice

By B. Clifford. 2001

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78e676e9ba9c3e4d96bc1a93758e148ee99c485b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Let me inform you how to tell a convincing story: CBCA and reality monitoring scores as a function of age, coaching, and deception (2004, background): “First, both raters read several major published papers about CBCA (Raskin & Esplin, 1991; Steller, 1989; Steller & Köhnken, 1989; Vrij, 2000; Vrij & Akehurst, 1998).”
Police Officers’ Lie Detection Accuracy: Interrogating Freely Versus Observing Video (2004, background): “In most studies, accuracy rates fall below 60% (Kraut, 1980; Vrij, 2000).”
Impression and Information Management: On the Strategic Self- Regulation of Innocent and Guilty Suspects (2010, background): “The literature on deception shows that lie-catching is an enterprise fraught with error (Vrij, 2000).”
Imprisoned knowledge: Criminals' beliefs about deception (2004, background): “The vast majority of studies investigating people's beliefs about cues to deception have been conducted with college students as participants (Vrij, 2000).”
Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID): an integrated system of investigative interviewing and detecting deception (2007, background): “…l. 4: 167–180 (2007) DOI: 10.1002/jip Hiscock-Anisman, & Memon, 2002; Colwell, Hiscock-Anisman, Memon, Woods, & Michlik, 2006; Porter & Yuille, 1996; Vrij, 2000) allows deceivers to reduce cognitive demand and anxiety, and to appear co-operative by providing suffi cient information whilst…”
Deception Detection using Real-life Trial Data (2015, methodology): “To date, several research publications on verbal-based deception detection have explored the identiﬁcation of deceptive content in a variety of domains, including online dating websites [39, 18], forums [42, 23], social networks [21], and consumer report web-sites [31, 24].”
Credibility of the emotional witness: A study of ratings by police investigators (2008, background): “…studies showing that police officers are no better than lay people at detecting lies and deceit when using nonverbal signs as cues (Ekman & O’Sullivan, 1991; Ekman et al., 1999; DePaulo et al., 2003; Garrido et al., 2004; Kassin et al., 2003; Meissner & Kassin, 2002; Vrij, 2000; Vrij & Mann, 2001).”
Accuracy of Deception Judgments (2006, background): “Vrij (2000) summarizes 9 percentage-correct studies to find a strong truth bias—a mean of 61.5% truth judgments, 67% accuracy for truths, and 44% accuracy for lies.”
Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interrogations (2007, background): “For example, liars tend to move their arms, hands and feet less than truth tellers (Sporer & Schwandt, 2002; Vrij, 2000) and liars Correspondence: Maria Hartwig, Department of Psychology, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, The City University of New York, 445 West 59th Street New York, NY 10019,…”
Individual differences and lying in everyday life (2008, background): “, “How often do you lie to your close friend to make him/her feel better about him/herself?”) (DePaulo et al., 1996; DePaulo & Kashy, 1998; DePaulo, Wetzel, Sternglanz, & Walker Wilson, 2003; Vrij, 2000).”