Adolescents' Exposure to Sexually Explicit Internet Material and Notions of Women as Sex Objects: Assessing Causality and Underlying Processes

By Jochen Peter, Patti M. Valkenburg. 2009

247 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78cf5292ccf9b0d1e80db0dcf6252fd0990597e5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Laura Vandenbosch
2. Jochen Peter
3. Patti M. Valkenburg
4. J. V. Oosten
5. Paul J. Wright
6. Gert Martin Hald
7. Jill C. Manning
8. Rory C Reid

In Gender Studies

1. Laura Vandenbosch
2. Jochen Peter
3. Patti M. Valkenburg
4. J. V. Oosten
5. Paul J. Wright
6. Gert Martin Hald
7. Jill C. Manning
8. Rory C Reid

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Patti M. Valkenburg
2. Jochen Peter
3. Joseph B. Walther
4. Susanne E. Baumgartner
5. Laura Vandenbosch
6. Paul J. Wright
7. J. V. Oosten
8. Gert Martin Hald

Citations in the corpus

• Internet pornography use and sexual motivation: a systematic review and integration (2019, background): “Building on this, in a longitudinal study of Dutch adolescents (N = 962, Age Range: 14–20; Peter & Valkenburg, 2009a), pornography use predicted general notions of women as sexual objects among both men and women.”
• Pornography and the Sexual Socialization of Children: Current Knowledge and a Theoretical Future (2014, background): “Pornography exposure predicted more agreement that women are sex objects among both boys and girls in the longitudinal study conducted by Peter and Valkenburg (2009).”
• Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model (2013, background): “Finally, adolescents who frequently watch pornography more often tend to see women as sex objects, which in turn increases their emotional responses to this material (Peter & Valkenburg, 2009).”
• Media Effects: Theory and Research. (2016, background): “Finally, adolescents who frequently watch pornography more often tend to see women as sex objects, which in turn increases their use of and emotional responses to this material (Peter & Valkenburg 2009).”
• Pornography and Sexist Attitudes Among Heterosexuals (2013, background): “In a number of reviews (e.g., Kingston, Malamuth, Fedoroff, & Marshall, 2009) and research papers (e.g., Peter & Valkenburg, 2009, 2010) investigators have emphasized the importance of considering individual differences as moderators and mediators of the relationship between pornography and…”
• The Impact of Internet Pornography on Adolescents: A Review of the Research (2012, background): “Beliefs of women as sex objects are defined by Peter and Valkenburg (2009) as “ideas about women that reduce them to their sexual appeal in terms of their outer appearance and their body (parts)” (p. 408).”
• Unwanted Online Sexual Solicitation and Risky Sexual Online Behavior across the Lifespan (2010, background): “Previous research has acknowledged that online surveys are especially useful when sensitive issues like sexuality are investigated (Mustanski, 2001; Peter & Valkenburg, 2006, 2009).”
• The Relationship Between Online Pornography and the Sexual Objectification of Women: The Attenuating Role of Porn Literacy Education (2017, methodology): “The results on the relationship between SEIM use and views of women as sex objects warrant scholarly attention (Peter & Valkenburg, 2009).”
• Pornography, Individual Differences in Risk and Men’s Acceptance of Violence Against Women in a Representative Sample (2011, unknown): “This prediction is based on the Confluence model’s assumption that consuming relatively large amounts of pornography is often both a reflection of some of the risk factors and may be an added cause of increased risk (Peter and Valkenburg 2009).”