Cost and Profit Efficiency of the Turkish Banking Industry: An Empirical Investigation

By Ihsan Berk Isik, M. Hassan. 2002

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Efficiency of conventional versus Islamic banks: evidence from the Middle East (2009, background): “Second, some studies have compared efficiency scores of foreign-owned banks with domestic-owned banks ( Isik and Hassan, 2002b”
THE X-EFFICIENCY IN ISLAMIC BANKS (2006, methodology): “Like many studies on banking efficiency (Isik and Hassan, 2002ab, 2003abc and among others), we adopt the intermediation 5 For a thorough explanation of DEA analysis and TFP calculations, see Coelli, T.J., Prasada Rao, D.S., and Battese, G.E. (1998), An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity…”
Ownership Structure and Risk-Taking: Comparative Evidence from Private and State-Controlled Banks in China (2014, background): “State-controlled banks have been found to be associated with less risk in Russia (Fungáčová and Solanko, 2009), and higher efficiency in India (Bhattacharyya et al., 1997) and Turkey (Isik and Hassan, 2002).”
Cost, revenue and profit efficiency of Islamic versus conventional banks: International evidence using data envelopment analysis (2008, background): “See Isik and Hassan (2002a).”
Assessing Production Efficiency of Islamic Banks and Conventional Bank Islamic Windows in Malaysia (2008, background): “On the other hand, the non-US studies found that foreign banks are more efficient than domestic banks; for instance, Hungarian banks (Hasan and Marton, 2001); and Turkish banks (Zaim, 1995; Isik and Hassan, 2002).”