Cost, revenue and profit efficiency of Islamic versus conventional banks: International evidence using data envelopment analysis
By Mohammed Bader, S. Mohamad, Mohamed Ariff, Taufiq Hassan Shah. 2008
251 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9e52b2a5c51eadbd1def6805b3cf4a7c60158f4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jill Johnes
- Marwan Izzeldin
- Vasileios Pappas
- Iftekhar Hasan
- Michael Doumpos
- Fotios Pasiouras
- Fadzlan Sufian
- Ana Lozano-Vivas
Citations in the corpus
- A Comparison of Performance of Islamic and Conventional Banks 2004 to 2009 (2014, background): “…no significant difference in efficiency between the two types of banking (Abdul-Majid et al. 2005b; El-Gamal and Inanoglu 2005; Mokhtar et al. 2006; Bader 2008; Hassan et al. 2009; Shahid et al. 2010); some studies do not test whether observed differences in efficiency are significant and this is…”
- Islamic Banking and Finance: Recent Empirical Literature and Directions for Future Research (2015, unknown): “, 2008; Gheeraeart and Weill, 2014) or non-parametric (Yudistra, 2004; Bader et al., 2008; Johnes et al., 2014) to model cross-country bank cost and profit efficiency (as well as productivity).”
- Bank overall financial strength: Islamic versus conventional banks (2017, background): “Bader et al. (2008) conclude that there are no significant differences.”