Characteristics of the ocean simulations in the Max Planck Institute Ocean Model (MPIOM) the ocean component of the MPI‐Earth system model

By Johann Jungclaus, N. Fischer, Helmuth Haak, K. Lohmann, Jochem Marotzke, D. Matei, Uwe Mikolajewicz, D. Notz, J. Storch. 2013

749 citations recorded by the source corpus.

MPI‐ESM is a new version of the global Earth system model developed at the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology. This paper describes the ocean state and circulation as well as basic aspects of variability in simulations contributing to the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). The performance of the ocean/sea‐ice model MPIOM, coupled to a new version of the atmosphere model ECHAM6 and modules for land surface and ocean biogeochemistry, is assessed for two model versions with different grid resolution in the ocean. The low‐resolution configuration has a nominal resolution of 1.5°, whereas the higher resolution version features a quasiuniform, eddy‐permitting global resolution of 0.4°. The paper focuses on important oceanic features, such as surface temperature and salinity, water mass distribution, large‐scale circulation, and heat and freshwater transports. In general, these integral quantities are simulated well in comparison with observational estimates, and improvements in comparison with the predecessor system are documented; for example, for tropical variability and sea ice representation. Introducing an eddy‐permitting grid configuration in the ocean leads to improvements, in particular, in the representation of interior water mass properties in the Atlantic and in the representation of important ocean currents, such as the Agulhas and Equatorial current systems. In general, however, there are more similarities than differences between the two grid configurations, and several shortcomings, known from earlier versions of the coupled model, prevail.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78b9abb921d63bf7147053a74d06dfd13badc41b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

  1. Johann Jungclaus
  2. Jochem Marotzke
  3. Holger Pohlmann
  4. Helmuth Haak
  5. T. Mauritsen
  6. Jin-Song von Storch
  7. M. Esch
  8. Robert Pincus

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Jochem Marotzke
  2. Johann Jungclaus
  3. Helmuth Haak
  4. Holger Pohlmann
  5. M. Esch
  6. T. Mauritsen
  7. Jin-Song von Storch
  8. E. Roeckner

In Oceanography

  1. Jochem Marotzke
  2. Johann Jungclaus
  3. Jin-Song von Storch
  4. Helmuth Haak
  5. Holger Pohlmann
  6. E. Roeckner
  7. T. Mauritsen
  8. Aiko Voigt

Citations in the corpus