Poverty in dictator games: Awakening solidarity
By Pablo Brañas-Garza. 2003
195 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78aa4ea7a62576dc38285845907b4c526f02cd47
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Decision Sciences
- Christoph Engel
- Juan-Camilo Cardenas
- Francesco Guala
- Luigi Mittone
- Jeffrey P. Carpenter
- Ananish Chaudhuri
- Giovanni Di Bartolomeo
- Stefano Papa
In Safety Research
- Christoph Engel
- Jeffrey P. Carpenter
- Juan-Camilo Cardenas
- Francesco Guala
- Luigi Mittone
- Ananish Chaudhuri
- Elinor Ostrom
- E. Kirchler
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jeffrey P. Carpenter
- Christoph Engel
- Juan-Camilo Cardenas
- Francesco Guala
- Luigi Mittone
- Ananish Chaudhuri
- E. Seki
Citations in the corpus
- Behavioural Development Economics: Lessons from Field Labs in the Developing World (2008, background): “deservingness effects are found in Branas-Garza (2003) who finds that donations”
- Dictator games: a meta study (2011, background): “…Güth et al. 2005; Haley and Fessler 2005; Holm and Danielson 2005; Holm and Engseld 2005; Kamas, Baum et al. 2005; Ashraf, Bohnet et al. 2006; Branas-Garza 2006; Capra and Li 2006; Carpenter, Liati et al. 2006; Cox and Deck 2006; Dana, Cain et al. 2006; Dufwenberg and Muren 2006a; Dufwenberg…”
- Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments (2010, unknown): “Depending on the experimental details, the fraction of subjects giving money varies over a wide range: for example, only around 10% of the subjects gave money in treatments by Hoffman et al. (1994), but over 95% did so in a treatment by Branas-Garza (2006) .”
- Paradigmatic Experiments: the Dictator Game (2010, background): “Brañas Garza (2006) similarly observed that recipients from poor countries attract higher levels of donation than anonymous individuals drawn from the same pool of subjects as dictators, and that specifying the way in which money is going to be spent (e.g. to purchase medicines) further enhances…”
- Gender Differences in Altruism: Expectations, Actual Behaviour and Accuracy of Beliefs (2016, unknown): “ising dictator would donate nothing. For this reason, dictators’ donations are taken as a measure of individual’s altruism, or inequity aversion (Fehr and Schmidt (1999); Bolton and Ockenfels (2000); Brañas-Garza (2006, 2007); Charness and Gneezy (2008)). 2.2 Protocol In our experiment, subjects wer”