Marginal Effects in Interaction Models: Determining and Controlling the False Positive Rate

By J. Esarey, J. Sumner. 2018

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7882b667d6e506db4c99d6c39990e3eb5b7d2119

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Leor Zmigrod
2. Trevor W. Robbins
3. Peter J. Rentfrow
4. S. Zmigrod

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Trevor W. Robbins
2. Peter J. Rentfrow
3. Leor Zmigrod
4. S. Zmigrod

In Statistics and Probability

1. Trevor W. Robbins
2. Peter J. Rentfrow
3. Leor Zmigrod
4. S. Zmigrod

Citations in the corpus

• The psychological roots of intellectual humility: The role of intelligence and cognitive flexibility (2019, methodology): “and analytical (Evans, 2003, 2008; Evans & Stanovich, 2013; Kahneman & Frederick, 2002). The corollary of this dual-systems approach is that in order to reason intelligently and avoid biased thinking, it is necessary to engage System 2 processes which are deliberate and analytical, and to override t”
• Overstating and Understating Interaction Results in International Business Research (2017, unknown): “Additionally, we refer scholars to discussions about levels of measurement (Allison, 1977), symmetric interactions (Berry et al., 2012), false positive rates (Esarey & Sumner, 2016), and flexible estimation strategies (Hainmueller, Mummolo, & Xu, 2016).”