Subsidizing charitable contributions: a natural field experiment comparing matching and rebate subsidies

By Catherine C. Eckel, Philip J. Grossman. 2008

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/787fce2f6f0586052252554caf957dc3470d03de

Citations in the corpus

• Fundraising through online social networks: A field experiment on peer-to-peer solicitation (2014, unknown): “This is in accordancewiththeresearchonmatchingfundsincharitabledonations (Karlan and List, 2007; Eckel and Grossman, 2008; Huck and Rasul, 2011) where larger monetary matches are not more effective than smaller matches.”
• Field Experiments in Economics: the Past, the Present, and the Future (2008, unknown): “A related example is the large scale natural field experiment due to Eckel and Grossman ( 2008 ) .”
• Do fairness and race matter in generosity? Evidence from a nationally representative charity experiment (2011, unknown): “We see our paper as complementary to field experiments, which typically meet all desiderata except the third (Frey and Meier, 2004; Croson and Shang, 2009; Landry et al., 2006; Falk, 2007; Karlan and List, 2007; Eckel and Grossman, 2008; DellaVigna et al., 2009; List and Price, 2009; Meer, 2009).”