Penetration of auroral electric fields to the equator during a substorm
By Takashi Kikuchi, Hermann Lühr, K. Schlegel, H. Tachihara, M. Shinohara, T. Kitamura. 2000
224 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/782ded17d48e7fa00baa961a19079911fad11c9a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Geophysics
In Molecular Biology
Citations in the corpus
- Sq and EEJ—A Review on the Daily Variation of the Geomagnetic Field Caused by Ionospheric Dynamo Currents (2017, unknown): “The time scale for the shielding processes is typically less than one hour (Kikuchi et al. 2000; Peymirat et al. 2000) but subject to magnetospheric conditions (Senior and Blanc 1984; Maruyama et al.”
- Long‐duration penetration of the interplanetary electric field to the low‐latitude ionosphere during the main phase of magnetic storms (2005, background): “... within the ring current cannot fully develop to cancel out the magnetospheric convection electric field, and the convection electric field will continuously leak to (or penetrate to) the low-latitude ionosphere without significant decay for many hours as long as the strengthening of the magnetic”
- Equatorial Ionospheric Electric Fields During the November 2004 Magnetic Storm (2007, unknown): “They disturb the ionosphere nearly simultaneously from middle to equatorial latitudes [e.g., Kikuchi et al., 1996, 2000 ].”
- Penetration of magnetospheric electric fields to the equator during a geomagnetic storm (2008, unknown): “The second is the growth time of the shielding electric field which was several hours for the storm main phase [Huang et al., 2005], although the shielding time was about 20 min for the substorm [Somayajulu et al., 1987; Kikuchi et al., 2000b ].”
- Super plasma fountain and equatorial ionization anomaly during penetration electric field (2009, background): “This and other unusually large deviations of the drift velocity on 9 November (Figure 1) are discussed by Fejer et al. [2007] and seem to be due to eastward and westward prompt penetration and disturbance dynamo action [e.g., Kikuchi et al., 2000; Kelley et al., 2003].”