The public accountability index: crafting a parametric disclosure index for annual reports
By D. Coy, Keith Dixon. 2004
207 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management Information Systems, Public Administration
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7825b1085424f9ea6b87d9c5aff82b42de8b2165
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Collins G. Ntim
- T. Soobaroyen
- M. Broad
- Grant Samkin
- Alpa Dhanani
- A. Schneider
- Ciaran Connolly
- Ahmed A. Elamer
In Management Information Systems
In Public Administration
Citations in the corpus
- Discharging not-for-profit accountability: UK charities and public discourse (2012, background): “To do this, consistent with prior research of this type (Coy and Dixon, 2004), the paper draws on relevant theory (see the theoretical section) and borrows from prior empirical research into both for-profit and NFP accountability and the disclosure practices advocated in the NFP sector (for example,”
- Intellectual Capital Reporting by the New Zealand Local Government Sector (2008, methodology): “(See for example; Botosan, 1997; Buzby, 1975; Cerf, 1961; Chow & Wong-Boren, 1987; Coy & Dixon, 2004; Craig & Diga, 1998; Firer & Meth, 1986; Firth, 1978; 1979; Hooks, Coy & Davey, 2002; Singhvi & Desai, 1971; and Zarzeski, 1996).”
- Disclosure Measurement in the Empirical Accounting Literature - A Review Article (2010, unknown): “…Wallace et al., 1994; Meek et al., 1995; Inchausti, 1997; Botosan, 1997] and the 2000s [see, for example, Depoers, 2000; Hope, 2003a; 2003b; Abd-Elsalam and Weetman, 2003; 2007; Naser and Nuseibeh, 2003; Ali, Ahmed and Henry, 2004; Coy and Dixon, 2004; Hassan, Romilly, Giorgioni and Power, 2009].”
- Governance Structures, Voluntary Disclosures and Public Accountability: The Case of UK Higher Education Institutions (2017, methodology): “…boards are able to coordinate and communicate better (Lipton and Lorsch, 1992; Jensen, 1993; Yermack, 1996) and therefore may be more capable at protecting the public interest (public accountability) than larger boards (Coy et al., 1997; Coy et al., 2001; Nelson et al., 2003; Coy and Dixon, 2004).”