Cross‐taxon congruence in complementarity and conservation of temperate biodiversity

By Mette Palitzsch Lund, C. Rahbek. 2002

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77fa59283b9e4864a91dc44466413e80154a7661

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Complementarity analysis: Mapping the performance of surrogates for biodiversity (2006, methodology): “This is in direct contrast to Lund and Rahbek (2002), who concluded that the surrogacy approach would be an ineffective method for the representation of overall biodiversity if only 10% of the area could be managed for conservation.”
Important Plant Areas: revised selection criteria for a global approach to plant conservation (2017, background): “…important sites for other vertebrate taxa is high (Brooks et al. 2001; Eken et al. 2004), wider cross-taxon congruence can vary tremendously (e.g., Lund and Rahbek 2002; Kati et al. 2004; Heino 2010; Sabatini et al. 2016) and evidence suggests that the congruence between important sites for…”
The white-backed woodpecker: umbrella species for forest conservation planning? (2008, background): “Such data have proved useful in several studies addressing the occurrence of rare species from inconspicuous taxa at the scale of landscapes over large regions (e.g., Lund and Rahbek 2002; Rubino and Hess 2003; Hess et al. 2006).”
Species distributions, surrogacy, and important conservation regions in Canada (2004, unknown): “The divergence in conclusions results from three factors, namely different methods in measuring surrogacy (Andelman & Fagan 2000; Reyers et al. 2000; Hopkinson et al. 2001; Lund & Rahbek 2002 ), different scales of study and sample units (Flather et al. 1997; Warman et al. 2004), and different unde”
Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) pass the bioindicator scorecard (2007, unknown): “(1998), DUELLI & OBRIST (1998), PALITZSCH LUND & RAHBEK (2002), SAUBERER & al.”
Vertical and Temporal Patterns of Biodiversity of Fruit-Feeding Butterflies in a Tropical Forest in Uganda (2004, background): “High congruence would be encouraging for rapid biodiversity assessment, but studies on temperate areas have revealed rather low congruence in species richness (but see Lund and Rahbek 2002).”
Assessing spider species richness and composition in Mediterranean cork oak forests (2008, background): “When this assumption is tested on comparable datasets, at least birds and mammals appear to be rather ineffective in relation to the use of various arthropod taxa (e.g. Lund and Rahbek, 2000, 2002; Lund, 2002).”
Recommendations for Assessing the Effectiveness of Surrogate Species Approaches (2006, background): “Several authors have taken this approach to test spatial relationships of species among diverse taxa and geographic regions (e.g., Pearson and Carroll 1999; Lund and Rahbek 2002).”
Surrogate taxa for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes of eastern Austria (2004, methodology): “It has been demonstrated that indicator taxa can act as surrogates in complementarity-derived area sets (Howard et al., 1998; Lund and Rahbek, 2002).”
Birds as biodiversity surrogates: will supplementing birds with other taxa improve effectiveness? (2012, methodology): “…well-known taxonomic group (such as birds) as a surrogate, and assume that priority areas for this taxon are also important for other taxa (e.g. Lund & Rahbek 2002; Moore et al. 2003; Saetersdal et al. 2004; Warman et al. 2004; Cabeza, Arponen & Van Teeffelen 2008; Franco et al. 2009; see also…”