The Justice Sensitivity Inventory: Factorial Validity, Location in the Personality Facet Space, Demographic Pattern, and Normative Data

334 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The MAD Model of Moral Contagion: The Role of Motivation, Attention, and Design in the Spread of Moralized Content Online (2019, background): “Furthermore, extensive research has found that people are sensitive to justice and other moral concerns (Lerner & Miller, 1978; Schmitt, Baumert, Gollwitzer, & Maes, 2010), and violations of justice lead to a motivation to restore justice and make moral content more salient in the environment…”
Harm inflation: Making sense of concept creep (2020, methodology): “…emotional concern for others and liberalism again emerged as strong correlates of holding broader concepts of harm (McGrath et al., 2019), which were also associated with sensitivity to perceiving injustice towards others, assessed by the Justice Sensitivity Inventory (Schmitt et al., 2010).”
Individual differences in third-party interventions: How justice sensitivity shapes altruistic punishment (2011, methodology): “Most importantly, despite correlations among the subscales (see Schmitt et al., 2010; for typical patterns), many studies have shown that JSvictim in particular can be distinguished from the remaining perspectives.”