A State-of-Knowledge Review of the Influence of Strong-Motion Duration on Structural Damage

By J. Hancock, J. Bommer. 2006

289 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/779d302de5939ad06a5222c01a7b36cccf7b1737

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. Agathoklis Giaralis
2. Pol D. Spanos
3. Brendon Bradley
4. K. Tarbali
5. P. Cacciola
6. J. Bommer
7. Helen Crowley

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Agathoklis Giaralis
2. Pol D. Spanos
3. Brendon Bradley

Citations in the corpus

• Derivation of response spectrum compatible non-stationary stochastic processes relying on Monte Carlo-based peak factor estimation (2012, methodology): “…the duration of strong ground motion based on field recorded accelerograms have been proposed in the literature (see e.g. Bommer and Martinez-Pereira 1999, and references therein), the herein adopted one is commonly used by the structural engineering community (see e.g. Hancock and Bommer 2006).”
• Correlation of Significant Duration with Amplitude and Cumulative Intensity Measures and Its Use in Ground Motion Selection (2011, background): “, not cumulative) response quantities; and oversimplification of the seismic response models considered, which typically lack cumulativeand strength-degrading material models and local failure modes, both of which elucidate the effects of ground motion duration [Hancock and Bommer, 2006; Krawinkler,”