Translocations of Amphibians: Proven Management Method or Experimental Technique?

By R. Seigel, C. K. Dodd. 2002

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Genetics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7785e12988a0b3294b76f091b0a00691620f92bd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. R. Rannap
2. And H Bradley Shaffer
3. P. Paton
4. P. Trenham
5. R. Egan

In Genetics

1. R. Rannap

In Global and Planetary Change

1. And H Bradley Shaffer
2. R. Rannap
3. P. Paton
4. P. Trenham
5. R. Egan
6. D. Green
7. Samuel A. Cushman

Citations in the corpus

• Impacts of habitat loss and restoration on amphibian populations (2009, background): “The translocation process is also time-consuming (Griffiths and Pavajeau 2008) and costly (Seigel and Dodd 2002).”
• Within-pond parameters affecting oviposition by wood frogs and spotted salamanders (2004, background): “…is important when considering their use in proactive management methods, such as egg mass translocations (Semlitsch 2002), which may (Marsh and Trenham 2001) or may not (Seigel and Dodd 2002) be an indispensable tool for conserving amphibians in landscapes containing multiple breeding ponds.”
• AMPHIBIAN UPLAND HABITAT USE AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR POPULATION VIABILITY (2005, background): “Strategies worth considering may include protecting corridors of marginal upland habitat between breeding sites, pond creation to enhance connectivity among distant sites, and even translocation of individuals to currently isolated unoccupied sites (Trenham and Marsh 2002, Seigel and Dodd 2002).”