AMPHIBIAN UPLAND HABITAT USE AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR POPULATION VIABILITY

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparative landscape dynamics of two anuran species: climate-driven interaction of local and regional processes (2009, background): “A great deal of amphibian conservation work has focused on how much upland habitat is necessary to maintain a population at a single pond (Semlitsch 1998, Trenham and Shaffer 2005).”
Effects of experimental forestry treatments on a Maine amphibian community (2006, background): “than the terrestrial environment used during the non-breeding season (Trenham and Shaffer, 2005; although see deMaynadier and Hunter, 1995; Regosin et al., 2003).”
Differentiating Migration and Dispersal Processes for Pond-Breeding Amphibians (2008, unknown): “…of migrations for pond-breeding species can be effectively estimated by measuring the emigration distance of resident adults using direct tracking techniques such as radiotelemetry and by mark–recapture with concentric drift fences at multiple distances (Madison 1997, Trenham and Shaffer 2005).”
Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: A review and prospectus (2006, background): “…composition effects have found relationships between forest cover and amphibian presence at spatial scales ranging from 100 m to over 3000 m radii (Hecnar and M’Closkey, 1997; Knutson et al., 1999; Lehtinen et al., 1999; Guerry and Hunter, 2002; Houlahan et al., 2000; Trenham and Shaffer, 2005).”