Reinforcement and coercion mechanisms in the development of antisocial behavior: The family.
By J. Snyder, Mark Stoolmiller. 2002
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/776bf30fc1d5bc37210ef43d8e647b66cd7d6418
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- James D. Unnever
- R. Agnew
- F. Cullen
- G. Patterson
- Susan J T Branje
- A. Kazdin
- Isabela Granic
- Tom Hollenstein
In Social Psychology
- James D. Unnever
- G. Patterson
- A. Kazdin
- Isabela Granic
- F. Cullen
- R. Agnew
- Susan J T Branje
- Stephen W. Baron
Citations in the corpus
- Why is “Bad” Parenting Criminogenic? Implications From Rival Theories (2006, background): “Most notably, parents model aggressive behavior when they punish their children in a coercive manner.2 And parents reinforce aggressive behavior when they give the child what he or she wants because the child antagonistically demands it (Patterson, Reid, & Dishion, 1992; Snyder & Stoolmiller, 2002).”
- Development of Parent–Adolescent Relationships: Conflict Interactions as a Mechanism of Change (2018, background): “interactions are the proximal engines of development (29), these fluctuations may be a key feature of relationships and relationship development.”
- Toward a comprehensive model of antisocial development: a dynamic systems approach. (2006, methodology): “Coercion theory is based on the proposition that real-time microsocial interactions are the proximal engines of development (Snyder & Stoolmiller, 2002; cf. Bronfenbrenner & Morris, 1998).”
- Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. (2007, background): “Among the many interaction patterns, those involving coercion have received the greatest attention (Patterson et al. 1992, Snyder & Stoolmiller 2002).”