The person response function as a tool in person-fit research

68 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparing the Aberrant Response Detection Performance of Thirty-Six Person-Fit Statistics (2003, methodology): “The last approach pertains to the very recent work of Sijtsma and Meijer (2001) , who, within the context of non-parametric IRT, propose a new method in testing person-fit based on the person response function.”
A Systematic Review of the Methodology for Person Fit Research in Item Response Theory: Lessons about Generalizability of Inferences from the Design of Simulation Studies (2013, methodology): “Some researchers further supplement numerical analyses with graphical approaches, in particular the person response function approach (e.g., Emons, Sijtsma, & Meijer, 2004, 2005; Sijtsma & Meijer, 2001).”
Nonparametric Item Response Theory in Action: An Overview of the Special Issue (2001, background): “Related to this interest in cognitive modeling is person-fit research or appropriateness measurement (e.g., Emons, Meijer, & Sijtsma, in press; Meijer, 1994; Sijtsma & Meijer, 2001).”
A Person Fit Test For Irt Models For Polytomous Items (2007, background): “Most person fit statistics were developed for IRT models for dichotomous items (Levine & Rubin, 1979; Wright & Stone, 1979; Tatsuoka, 1984; Smith, 1985, 1986; Klauer & Rettig, 1990; Drasgow, Levine, & McLaughlin, 1991; Sijtsma & Meijer, 2001 ).”