Towards transformation: conceptions of creativity in higher education
By P. Kleiman. 2008
183 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/772132270ade06585584ef87d1d1610b5b5400f2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Lauren Christophers
- Brendan Rooney
- A. Egan
- Päivi Tynjälä
- Urve Venesaar
- Rebecca Maguire
- Hasso Kukemelk
- Marge Täks
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Lauren Christophers
- Brendan Rooney
- A. Egan
- Päivi Tynjälä
- Urve Venesaar
- Rebecca Maguire
- Hasso Kukemelk
- Marge Täks
Citations in the corpus
- Teachers’ conceptions of student creativity in higher education (2017, background): “…levels of creativity, some target person and product, others analyse creative processes and creative environments (Guilford, 1956; Herrmann, 2009; Kleiman, 2008; Watson, KEYWORDS creativity; higher education; data-grounded framework; empirical study © 2015 Informa uK limited, trading as taylor &…”
- Developing creativity in higher education for 21st century learners: A protocol for a scoping review (2017, methodology): “Using qualitative analysis Kleiman (2008) observed five categories of views of the creative experience: that which is constraint focused, process focused, product focused, transformation focused and fulfilment focussed.”
- Engineering Students' Experiences in Studying Entrepreneurship (2014, methodology): “…research approach has rarely been applied in studies on engineering education (for exceptions, see Franz, Ferreira, & Thambiratnam, 1997; Stamouli & Huggard, 2007; Kleiman, 2008; Zoltowski, Oakes, & Cardella, 2012), or in studies on entrepreneurship (for an exception, see Kyr€o, 2009).”