Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity

By Waka Fujisaki, Shinsuke Shimojo, M. Kashino, Shin'ya Nishida. 2004

550 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Social Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sensory Systems

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “Later studies demonstrated that, either after passively adapting to asynchronous audiovisual events (Fujisaki et al., 2004; Vroomen et al., 2004), or after being trained to discriminate audiovisual synchrony (vs. asynchrony) with feedback (Powers et al., 2009), people’s perception of audiovisual…”
Timing sight and sound. (2005, methodology): “The tuning of this phenomenon may therefore be used as an implicit measure of perceptual simultaneity ( Fujisaki, Shimojo, Kashino, & Nishida, 1994 ).”
Rapid Recalibration to Audiovisual Asynchrony (2013, background): “An adaptive phenomenon known as temporal recalibration (Fujisaki et al., 2004; Vroomen et al., 2004) helps realign signals, as shown in a number of studies demonstrating that repeated exposure to an audiovisual asynchrony shifts the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) in the direction of the…”
Recalibration of auditory space following milliseconds of crossmodal discrepancy (2011, background): “This form of sensory recalibration has been shown in both the temporal (Fujisaki et al., 2004; Vroomen et al., 2004; Harrar and Harris, 2008; Navarra et al., 2009) and spatial domains (Canon, 1970; Radeau and Bertelson, 1974).”
Music expertise shapes audiovisual temporal integration windows for speech, sinewave speech, and music (2014, background): “Recent studies have shown that the temporal integration window can be narrowed or shifted via long-term musical training (Petrini et al., 2009), short-term perceptual learning (Powers et al., 2009), or shortterm audiovisual exposure (Fujisaki et al., 2004).”
Perception of intersensory synchrony: A tutorial review (2010, unknown): “Fujisaki et al. (2004) demonstrated that the effect of adaptation to temporal misalignment was effective, even when the visual test stimulus was very different from the exposure situation.”
Infant perception of audio-visual speech synchrony. (2010, background): “In adults, initial adaptation to an asynchronous audiovisual event induces lower sensitivity to A-V temporal relations and causes adults to bind the auditory and visual attributes representing perceptually asynchronous audiovisual events and leads them to perceive such events as synchronous (Fujisak”
No effect of synesthetic congruency on temporal ventriloquism (2010, background): “As concerns the random variation in AV interval between trials, we are of the opinion that this is the best possible solution, since varying the interval between trials prevents the occurrence of temporal recalibration, a phenomenon in which participants adjust their perception of AV synchrony to a ”
Perceptual training narrows the temporal window of multisensory binding (2009, background): “It should also be noted that the mean window sizes and shapes observed at baseline assessment ( 275–300 ms, skewed toward the positive side of the distribution) are very much in accord with those reported in previous work (Dixon and Spitz, 1980; Bushara et al., 2001; Zampini et al., 2003, 2005a,b; C”
The Construct of the Multisensory Temporal Binding Window and its Dysregulation in Developmental Disabilities (2014, background): “Finally, the TBW has been shown to be malleable in multiple ways, both adjusting to the temporal statistics of the environment (recalibration (Fujisaki et al., 2004; Keetels & Vroomen, 2007, 2008b; Navarra et al., 2005; Stetson et al., 2006; Vroomen et al., 2004)), and in perceptual plasticity…”
When correlation implies causation in multisensory integration. (2012, unknown): “To avoid the possibility of crossmodal temporal recalibration [20], visualleading or auditory-leading trials pseudorandomly alternated in the bimodal block of trials.”
Bayesian Inference Explains Perception of Unity and Ventriloquism Aftereffect: Identification of Common Sources of Audiovisual Stimuli (2007, unknown): “For example, if we present the adapting stimuli with more spatial or temporal disparities than those in our simulation, the adaptation effect may disappear; however, some experimental results have suggested that the adaptation effect can be observed even when the disparities are relatively large( Fu”
Audiovisual synchrony and temporal order judgments: Effects of experimental method and stimulus type (2008, methodology): “d PSS values determined by fitting a cumulative Gaussian (TOJ), or a truncated Gaussian (SJ; see Fujisaki et al., 2004 ) to medians of “audio first” and “video first” response proportions obtained from delays from �120 to �120 msec reported in the top half of “Tableau I” (similar to Neumann & Niepe”