Why did my car just do that? Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance
By Jeamin Koo, Jungsuk Kwac, Wendy Ju, Martin Steinert, L. Leifer, Clifford Nass. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (ijidem), 2014
494 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76d259940fe57f399a992ea0e2bb6cd5304b6a23
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Explanations and Expectations: Trust Building in Automated Vehicles (2018, background): “However, research has shown that an AV can potentially mitigate this negative effect by providing an explanation about why it has taken specific actions [3, 4].”
- From ‘automation’ to ‘autonomy’: the importance of trust repair in human–machine interaction (2018, unknown): “…improving human–automation trust calibration (e.g. McGuirl and Sarter 2006; de Visser et al. 2014), enhancing the general transparency of the system (Koo et al. 2014; Mercado et al. 2016), communicating intent (Schaefer et al. 2017), conveying uncertainty (Helldin et al. 2013), and assessing the…”
- Explanations in Autonomous Driving: A Survey (2021, methodology): “Attributes such as trust which have been used for explanation assessment in AVs [13], [12] should be measured using a progressive experiment occurring in a real-world setting in order to obtain accurate”
- Autonomous driving: investigating the feasibility of car-driver handover assistance (2015, methodology): “Due to findings of Koo et al. [10], we expected to find an advantage in the presentation of the reason of a TOR (ALERT&TOR condition) in critical situations.”