Effective Field Theory of Cosmic Acceleration: an implementation in CAMB

By Bin Hu, M. Raveri, N. Frusciante, A. Silvestri. 2013

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We implement the effective field theory (EFT) approach to dark energy and modified gravity in the public Einstein-Boltzmann solver CAMB. The resulting code, which we dub EFTCAMB, is a powerful and versatile tool that can be used for several objectives. It can be employed to evolve the full dynamics of linear scalar perturbations in any given single field dark energy or modified gravity model, once the latter is mapped into the EFT formalism. It offers a numerical implementation of EFT as a model-independent framework to test gravity on cosmological scales. EFTCAMB has a built-in check for the fulfillment of general stability conditions such as the absence of ghost and superluminal propagation of perturbations. It handles phantom-divide crossing models and does not contain any quasi-static approximation, but rather evolves the full dynamics of perturbations on linear scales. As we will show, the latter is an important feature in view of the accuracy and scale range of upcoming surveys. We show the reliability and applicability of our code by evolving the dynamics of linear perturbations and extracting predictions for power spectra in several models. In particular we perform a thorough analysis of f(R) theories, comparing our outputs with those of an existing code for LCDM backgrounds, and finding an agreement that can reach 0.1% for models with a Compton wavelength consistent with current cosmological data. We then showcase the flexibility of our code studying two different scenarios. First we produce new results for designer f(R) models with a time-varying dark energy equation of state. Second, we extract predictions for linear observables in some parametrized EFT models with a phantom-divide crossing equation of state for dark energy.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76c61bd1333572068bb8f27eef15f1e593585b77

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Louis Pèrenon
  2. Lavinia Heisenberg
  3. N. Frusciante
  4. K. Koyama
  5. D. Langlois
  6. Tsutomu Kobayashi
  7. M. Zumalacárregui
  8. S. Tsujikawa

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Lavinia Heisenberg
  2. K. Koyama
  3. D. Langlois
  4. Louis Pèrenon
  5. N. Frusciante
  6. S. Tsujikawa
  7. F. Vernizzi
  8. Pedro G. Ferreira

Citations in the corpus