Trade policy and regional inequalities
By Elisenda Paluzie. 2001
214 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76bda930c7cba6780b84935ca082f826cd8bde63
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Marius Brülhart
- A. Rodríguez‐Pose
- Roberto Ezcurra
- N. Gill
- P. Koenig
- M. Crozet
- Christian Lessmann
- R. Crescenzi
In Political Science and International Relations
- A. Rodríguez‐Pose
- Roberto Ezcurra
- Marius Brülhart
- N. Gill
- P. Koenig
- M. Crozet
- R. Crescenzi
- Christian Lessmann
Citations in the corpus
- The Rise of the “City-region” Concept and its Development Policy Implications (2008, background): “If we assume—as most economic models do—that cities are specialized in manufacturing and services, while the surrounding rural hinterlands are specialized in agriculture, then cities will grow as trade in manufacturing increases, often at the expense of their rural hinterlands (Paluzie, 2001).”
- How Does Trade Affect Regional Disparities (2006, methodology): “This could be taken as a support for both Paluzie’s (2001) ideas and some of the simple extensions of the H–O theory set out in Section 2.”
- Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis (2010, methodology): “Likewise, the models of the new economic geography provide different outcomes in relation to the link between trade and spatial inequality, depending on the theoretical assumptions employed in each case (e.g. Krugman and Livas Elizondo, 1996; Puga and Venables, 1999; Paluzie, 2001).”
- Enlargement and the EU Periphery: The Impact of Changing Market Potential (2004, methodology): “We develop a three-region model derived from Pflüger (2004), which in turn represents an analytically solvable version of Krugman’s (1991) core-periphery model.”
- The spatial effects of trade openness: a survey (2011, background): “…implied by the demand of spatially immobile “farmers” falls even faster than the that of the agglomeration force, implying that trade liberalisation, once it exceeds some threshold value, induces agglomeration.11 This mechanism drives the results of Monfort and Nicolini (2000) and Paluzie (2001).”