Enlargement and the EU Periphery: The Impact of Changing Market Potential

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Regional convergence and growth in Europe: understanding patterns and determinants (2011, background): “Based on earlier empirical findings (Baldone et al., 2001; Lyons et al., 2001; Brülhart et al., 2004; Kallioras and Petrakos, 2010), the impact of economic integration on regional growth is expected to be conditional, because advanced and less advanced regions may have different integration…”
Putting New Economic Geography to the Test: Free-Ness of Trade and Agglomeration in the EU Regions (2005, methodology): “(2003) or Brülhart et al. (2004) have found for the EU and its regions that agglomeration forces tend to be rather localized. In order to maximize the chance of finding strong agglomeration effects, the Krugman (1991) NEG model is useful because this model has an agglomeration bias: the model gives ”
The spatial effects of trade openness: a survey (2011, methodology): “Another exercise in the same vein is the analysis of Fujita et al. (1999, chap. 18). They add a sectoral dimension to the Krugman–Livas Elizondo (1996) model.”