Location choice in New England trawl fisheries: old habits die hard.
By D. Holland, J. Sutinen. 2000
241 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76bb3f68382bbf0d7381eab0190475d915231b60
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Global and Planetary Change
- J. Kritzer
- Michel J. Kaiser
- Martin D. Smith
- J. Poos
- A. Rijnsdorp
- J. Wilen
- Steven A. Murawski
- P. Rago
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- J. Poos
- A. Rijnsdorp
- J. Wilen
- Steven A. Murawski
- Michel J. Kaiser
- Martin D. Smith
- Michael Fogarty
- J. Sanchirico
Citations in the corpus
- The economics of spatial-dynamic processes: Applications to renewable resources (2009, methodology): “Thus, we choose a behavioral model structure that is consistent with empirical studies of fishing behavior over space and time (Eales and Wilen 1986; Dupont 1993; Holland and Sutinen 2000; Smith 2005).”
- State dependence and heterogeneity in fishing location choice (2005, background): “For this reason, a Random Utility Model has been the common approach to modeling spatial decisions in commercial fisheries [5,10,19,25,33].”
- An experiment on effort allocation of fishing vessels: the role of interference competition and area specialization (2007, background): “This may be the reason for the importance of previous fishing effort on selection of fishing grounds found in studies using random utility models (RUMs; Holland and Sutinen 2000; Hutton et al. 2004).”
- Estimation of Sample Selection Models with Spatial Dependence (2012, unknown): “[28] Holland, D.”
- Effort distribution and catch patterns adjacent to temperate MPAs (2005, background): “Explanatory variables determining location choice were lagged catch rates and the value of catches (Holland and Sutinen, 1999; Hutton et al., 2004) and habitual patterns of effort allocation (Holland and Sutinen, 2000).”
- Are marine protected areas a red herring or fisheries panacea (2005, background): “…are most likely to repeatedly return to locations that they know from past experience to yield economically rewarding catches with a minimum risk to gear and vessel safety and avoid excessive competition with other fishers (Gillis and Peterman 1998; Holland and Sutinen 2000; Jin et al. 2002).”
- Effects of Noncompliance on the Success of Alternative Designs of Marine Protected‐Area Networks for Conservation and Fisheries Management (2004, background): “…is evidence, however, that fishers are more likely to fish areas they have fished in the past, even when presented with information on potentially more productive sites, so fishing patterns by individuals can show considerable stasis over short to medium temporal scales (Holland & Sutinen 2000).”