Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Hydrogen Versus Other Technologies for Electrical Energy Storage

By D. Steward, G. Saur, M. Penev, T. Ramsden. 2009

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Energy Engineering and Power Technology, Pollution

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/768a40d1e54ba03fe4466c35ac1f00d8aeffb36c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. David Grosspietsch
2. V. H. Hoffmann
3. Tobias S. Schmidt
4. Benedikt Battke

In Energy Engineering and Power Technology

1. Tobias S. Schmidt

In Pollution

1. Tobias S. Schmidt

Citations in the corpus

• A comparative technoeconomic analysis of renewable hydrogen production using solar energy (2016, unknown): “63 The total capacity required for future energy storage will depend upon the ultimate mix of generation capacity and demand.”
• The role of storage technologies throughout the decarbonisation of the sector-coupled European energy system (2019, unknown): “Fuel cells are used to convert hydrogen back into electricity with 58% conversion efficiency and 339 e /kWe [23, 24].”
• Decreasing market value of variable renewables can be avoided by policy action (2020, background): “, 2017) and underground H2 storage from (Steward et al., 2009).”
• A review and probabilistic model of lifecycle costs of stationary batteries in multiple applications (2013, methodology): “10 EUR/kWh [23] in a comparable application.”
• An Introduction to Electrocatalyst Design using Machine Learning for Renewable Energy Storage (2020, background): “For comparison, an estimate from 2009 put the total cost at $240-280 per MWh [21].”