Economic Evaluation of Sectoral Emission Reduction Objectives for Climate Change

By C. Hendriks, D. Jager, J. Harnisch, J. Bates, L. Mantzos, M. Vainio. 2003

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/760057e552d71362e26ef69b114d486ea2c46756

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Environmental Engineering

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Exploring the ancillary benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for air pollution in Europe (2006, result): “which means that the costs estimated by Blok et al. (2001) could even be more consistent with the costs calculated here.”
A review of computer tools for analysing the integration of renewable energy into various energy systems (2010, methodology): “PRIMES has previously been used to create energy outlooks for the EU [204], develop a climate change action and renewable energy policy package for the EU [205] and also, to analyse a number of different policies to reduce GHG in the EU25 by 2030 [206,207].”
Long-term reduction potential of non-CO2 greenhouse gases (2007, background): “…US$/tCeq when methane recovery is installed at major sites, while another 25% reduction would be possible if a similar fraction of the organic waste were not dumped into landfills, but treated by incineration or composting with CH4 recovery, at a cost of 100–200 US$/tCeq (Bates and Haworth, 2001).”
The costs of the Kyoto protocol in the European Union (2003, unknown): “One might contrast our forecasts with EC studies, for example, where the goal was no doubt to understand how much more action would be required beyond what is already announced and being implemented (e.g. the ACEA agreement is incorporated in the baseline scenario) (EC, 1999; Blok et al., 2001).”
Marginal abatement cost curves: a call for caution (2011, background): “MAC curves have also been used in many other countries and regions, including the Netherlands (Blok et al., 1993), Ireland (Kennedy, 2010) the European Union (Blok et al., 2001) and California (Sweeney et al., 2008).”
Stimulating the use of biofuels in the European Union: Implications for climate change policy (2006, background): “Blok et al. (2001) estimated that the cost of technical measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the transport sector would range between €73-350/tCO2.”