Denial-of-Service in Wireless Sensor Networks: Attacks and Defenses

By David R. Raymond, S. Midkiff. IEEE pervasive computing, 2008

564 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Denial-of-Service detection in 6LoWPAN based Internet of Things (2013, background): “A survey about WSNs DoS attacks and defenses is illustrated in [5], [6].”
A Survey on Emerging SDN and NFV Security Mechanisms for IoT Systems (2019, background): “Jamming attacks can be continuous [67], thus causing full or intermittent dis-connectivity [68], to”
Anatomy of Threats to the Internet of Things (2019, background): “DoS attacks launched by sending fake/false messages to a node, server or a gateway device Weak link layer authentication and lack of antireplay protection [41, 83, 88]”
Jamming Attacks and Anti-Jamming Strategies in Wireless Networks: A Comprehensive Survey (2021, unknown): “[23] WSNs PHY/MAC/Network/Transport/Application”
Security Issues in Healthcare Applications Using Wireless Medical Sensor Networks: A Survey (2011, background): “As a result, it disturb network communication, and network resources exhaustion [66,67].”
Security of the Internet of Things: Vulnerabilities, Attacks, and Countermeasures (2019, background): “3.2.2.2 Defense against Denial of Sleep and Link Layer Flooding: Liu et al.’s anomaly detection-based IDS proposal works on ad hoc networks and therefore ﬁts well to the WSNs and IoT.”
DTLS based security and two-way authentication for the Internet of Things (2013, background): “The simplest approach to link layer security consists of using a network-wide encryption key, which often is the case in ZigBee networks [8].”