A Survey on Emerging SDN and NFV Security Mechanisms for IoT Systems
By I. Farris, Tarik Taleb, Yacine Khettab, Jaeseung Song. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 2019
346 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The explosive rise of Internet of Things (IoT) systems have notably increased the potential attack surfaces for cybercriminals. Accounting for the features and constraints of IoT devices, traditional security countermeasures can be inefficient in dynamic IoT environments. In this vein, the advantages introduced by software defined networking (SDN) and network function virtualization (NFV) have the potential to reshape the landscape of cybersecurity for IoT systems. To this aim, we provide a comprehensive analysis of security features introduced by NFV and SDN, describing the manifold strategies able to monitor, protect, and react to IoT security threats. We also present lessons learned in the adoption of SDN/NFV-based protection approaches in IoT environments, comparing them with conventional security countermeasures. Finally, we deeply discuss the open challenges related to emerging SDN- and NFV-based security mechanisms, aiming to provide promising directives to conduct future research in this fervent area.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80cd48346725cc9c790789157c6cbf05f0110e01
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Dinh C. Nguyen
- Pubudu N. Pathirana
- Ming Ding
- Aruna Prasad Seneviratne
- Syed Ali Hassan
- Ekram Hossain
- Divyansh Jain
- Pranav Goyal
Citations in the corpus
- Machine Learning Based Solutions for Security of Internet of Things (IoT): A Survey (2020, background): “vacy more in danger due to different threats/attacks [37], [38].”
- Machine Learning in IoT Security: Current Solutions and Future Challenges (2019, background): “The fact that IoT uses enabling technologies such as SoftwareDefined Networking (SDN), Cloud Computing (CC), and fog computing, also increases the landscape of threats for the attackers [19].”
- Security and Privacy for 6G: A Survey on Prospective Technologies and Challenges (2021, background): “The limitations and security challenges of specific technologies such as SDN [26], programmable networking, and Network Function Virtualization (NFV) [17], [41], particularly for Radio Access Network (RAN) [42] and Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) [24], [27] – which promise to play the key roles in”
- Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA): A Comprehensive Survey (2022, background): “Furthermore, to bring the NFV closer to the edge, container based network security virtualisation has been proposed wherein security functions are deployed in light-weight containers which require fewer resources compared to a virtual machine, and can be run on a single operating system [167].”
- Blockchain for 5G and Beyond Networks: A State of the Art Survey (2019, background): “Network function virtualization and service function chaining, however, also incur new security challenges [109], [110].”
- A Survey on Security and Privacy Issues in Edge-Computing-Assisted Internet of Things (2020, background): “In addition to its intelligent ability to reconfigure edge devices and route traffic of EC-assisted IoT networks, software-defined networking (SDN) also offers efficient and secure solutions for authentication and access control mechanisms [16], [37], [41], [89].”
- A Survey on IoT Security: Application Areas, Security Threats, and Solution Architectures (2019, background): “Security mechanisms for IoT security such as software defined networking (SDN) and network function virtualization (NFV) are discussed in [13].”
- The Future of Healthcare Internet of Things: A Survey of Emerging Technologies (2020, background): “The inclusion of SECaaS, which stands for security as a service in the current H-IoT systems, can solve a host of security problems faced by H-IoT systems at different levels of network protocol stack [60].”