A REMOVAL MODEL FOR ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITIES FROM POINT-COUNT SURVEYS

By George L. Farnsworth, K. Pollock, James D. Nichols, Theodore Simons, J. Hines, John R. Sauer. 2002

431 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/759816b5b6466b9333a833a22395e00102cd0048

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

Citations in the corpus

In Defense of Indices: The Case of Bird Surveys (2008, methodology): “…morphed into a torrent (Johnson 1995; Thompson et al. 1998; Nichols et al. 2000; Anderson 2001, 2003; Williams et al. 2001; Yoccoz et al. 2001; Farnsworth et al. 2002, 2005; MacKenzie and Kendall 2002; Rosenstock et al. 2002; Ellingson and Lukacs 2003; Norvell et al. 2003; White 2005;…”
Inferences About Landbird Abundance from Count Data: Recent Advances and Future Directions (2009, background): “Farnsworth et al. (2002) also consider the situation where the intervals are of unequal length.”
MODELING ABUNDANCE EFFECTS IN DISTANCE SAMPLING (2004, background): “In particular, it can be applied to problems where the multinomial likelihood is based on other sampling protocols such as multiple observer (Nichols et al. 2000), removal (Farnsworth et al. 2002), and even conventional capture–recapture when there are spatially indexed samples.”
Using mark–recapture distance sampling methods on line transect surveys (2014, background): “A third, removal configuration will not be considered here, but it is often used with bird surveys (e.g. Farnsworth et al. 2002).”
ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM REPEATED PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA OR POINT COUNTS (2003, background): “Avian point counts can be used to draw inferences about abundance when distances to detected birds are recorded (Buckland et al. 2001), when multiple observers conduct the counts (Nichols et al. 2000), or when the timing of detections is recorded (Farnsworth et al. 2002).”
EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE AUDITORY DETECTION PROCESS ON AVIAN POINT COUNTS (2007, methodology): “…distance sampling (Buckland et al. 2001), multipleobserver methods (Nichols et al. 2000, Alldredge et al. in press a), time-ofdetection methods (Farnsworth et al. 2002, Alldredge et al. in press b), double sampling (Bart and Earnst 2002) and repeated count methods (Royle and Nichols 2003, Kery…”
Calibrating indices of avian density from non‐standardized survey data: making the most of a messy situation (2013, methodology): “Removal models (Farnsworth et al. 2002; Alldredge et al. 2007a) and distance sampling (Buckland et al. 2001) are commonly used to estimate p and q, respectively.”
ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITY AND DENSITY FROM POINT-COUNT SURVEYS: A COMBINATION OF DISTANCE AND DOUBLE-OBSERVER SAMPLING (2006, methodology): “Farnsworth et al. (2002) suggested the use of temporal removal methods for estimating P a ; however, these methods require longer counts, which may result in a positive bias because of birds moving into the detection radius, violating the assumption that birds are detected at their initial…”