A phylogenetic analysis of dung beetles (Scarabaeinae : Scarabaeidae): unrolling an evolutionary history
By T. K. Philips, E. Pretorius, C. Scholtz. 2004
129 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Paleontology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/758583307634f9d1e60e13f74ac87de2cfc4a527
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
In Paleontology
Citations in the corpus
- An Overview of the Classification and Evolution of the Major Scarab Beetle Clades (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) Based on Preliminary Molecular Analyses (2006, methodology): “…have not sequenced any taxa from the following extant Scarabaeoidea families and subfamilies, and therefore these groups are not dealt with in this paper: Belohinidae; Chaetocanthinae (Ochodaeidae); and Aulonocneminae, Dynamopodinae, Eremazinae, Phaenomeridinae, and Termitotroginae (Scarabaeidae).”
- Insects ‘Down Under’– Diversity, endemism and evolution of the Australian insect fauna: examples from select orders (2004, background): “Lepanus Balthazar, Demarziella Balthazar and Amphistomus van Lansberge possible sister taxa to the Madagascar Arachnodes Westwood and the African Pedaria Castelnau and Anachalcos Hope, respectively (Davis et al. 2002; Philips et al. 2004).”
- Habitat fragmentation alters the structure of dung beetle communities in the Atlantic Forest (2011, background): “Additionally, dung beetles are abundant and diverse in the tropics (Philips et al., 2004), where their communities respond to soil type (Osberg et al.”
- Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: A quantitative literature review and meta-analysis (2007, background): “They also have well understood ecological roles (Hanski and Cambefort, 1991) and a relatively stable taxonomy (Philips et al., 2004).”