LA CLASE MÁGICA: IMAGINING OPTIMAL POSSIBILITIES IN A BILINGUAL COMMUNITY OF LEARNERS

By R. Heredia. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2005

885 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7578e8c4045175f7623f905d6b3262255969133c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cultural Studies

In Education

Citations in the corpus

What Do We (Think We) Know About Formulaic Language? An Evaluation of the Current State of Play (2012, background): “Formulaic language has become very productively associated with the new generation of grammatical theories that locate multiword strings at the center, rather than the periphery, of our linguistic experience (Ellis, 2008; Taylor, 2002).”
Psycholinguistics, formal grammars, and cognitive science (2005, background): “In some ways, it is ironic that other schools of linguistics that explicitly refer to themselves as “cognitive” (e.g., Taylor 2002) or that have been specifically designed to be representationally compatible with real-time processing algorithms (e.g., Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammars; Pollard…”
Cognitive Perspectives on SLA: The Associative-Cognitive CREED (2006, background): “…and schematic; this apperceptive reasoning involves as a natural basis a lower plane of consciousness that is unreflective and perceptual; these perceptual activities rest upon sensory neural bases; these in turn involve a physico-chemical basis; and so on, as with the fleas,1 ad infinitum.”
Usage‐Based Language: Investigating the Latent Structures That Underpin Acquisition (2013, background): “In language comprehension, abstract linguistic constructions (like locatives, datives, and passives) guide the listener’s attention to a particular perspective on a scene while backgrounding other aspects (Langacker, 1987; Talmy, 2000; Taylor, 2002).”
The cognitive linguistics enterprise: an overview (2007, background): “For instance, consider the following example adapted from John Taylor (2002):”
Rules or schemas? Evidence from Polish (2004, background): “Another single-mechanism approach was developed by cognitive linguists and sometimes goes under the name of ‘schema theory’ (Bybee, 1995; Langacker, 1991, 2000; see also Taylor, 2002).”