Linear and Nonlinear Rheology of Living Cells

By P. Kollmannsberger, B. Fabry. 2011

397 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Microrheology with optical tweezers: data analysis (2012, background): “In addition, microrheology measurements can be performed in situ in an environment that cannot be reached by a bulk rheology experiment, for instance inside a living cell [26].”
Describing the firmness, springiness and rubberiness of food gels using fractional calculus. Part I: Theoretical framework (2017, neutral): “…valid outside the domain of measurement making ex-107 trapolation difficult and thus the extracted model parameters lack a strong physical underpin-108 ning (Kollmannsberger and Fabry, 2011; Jaishankar and McKinley, 2013) which is essential109 for a connection to the underpinning microstructure.”
Describing the firmness, springiness and rubberiness of food gels using fractional calculus. Part II: Measurements on semi-hard cheese (2017, background): “106 Furthermore the fitted results are not valid outside the domain of measurement making ex107 trapolation difficult and thus the extracted model parameters lack a strong physical underpin108 ning (Kollmannsberger and Fabry, 2011; Jaishankar and McKinley, 2013) which is essential 109 for a connecti”
Power-law rheology in the bulk and at the interface: quasi-properties and fractional constitutive equations (2013, background): “Consequently, the model parameters that are obtained lack physical meaning [18].”
Physics of adherent cells (2013, background): “3 of Kollmannsberger and Fabry (2011).”