REGRET: A reputation model for gregarious societies

By J. Sabater, Carles Sierra. 2001

515 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74bca93334770b2507486a55336415cf081b46b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Multi-Agent Systems (2017, unknown): “Regret [27, 26] is a reputation model in which the trust evaluation process is completely decentralised.”
Notions of reputation in multi-agents systems: a review (2002, methodology): “In the computer science field, both Sabater and Sierra (2001), Halberstadt and Mui (2001) have postulated different mapping between the initial individual reputation of a stranger and the group from which he or she comes from.”
Review on Computational Trust and Reputation Models (2005, background): “ReGreT (Sabater and Sierra, 2001; Sabater and Sierra, 2002) is a modular trust and reputation system oriented to complex small/midsize e-commerce environments where social relations among individuals play an important role.”
TRAVOS: Trust and Reputation in the Context of Inaccurate Information Sources (2006, background): “Generally, however, models not based on probability theory [7, 14, 20] calculate trust from handcrafted formulae that yield the desired results, but that can be considered somewhat ad hoc (although approaches using information theory [15] and Dempster-Shafer theory [19] also exist).”
Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems (2002, background): “Categories and Subject Descriptors I.2.11 [Distributed Arti.cial Intelligence]:Multiagent systems; I.2.11 [Distributed Arti.cial Intelligence]:Intelligent agents; I.2.0 [General]:Cognitive simulation General Terms Algorithms,Design,Theory 1.”
Computational trust and reputation models for open multi-agent systems: a review (2011, methodology): “Regret (Sabater and Sierra 2001; Sabater- Mir 2003) and BDI + Repage model (Pinyol et al. 2010; Pinyol and Sabater-Mir 2009) are good examples of such models.”
REGRET: reputation in gregarious societies (2001, background): “A detailed description of these experiments and their results can be found in [2].”
A computational model of trust and reputation (2002, background): “Ad-hoc formulation plagues several other proposals for reputation/trust systems such as those in Glass, et al. (2000), Yu and Singh (2001), Esfandiari, et al., (2001), Rouchier, et al. (2001), Sabater, et al., (2001), among others.”
Trust and reputation model in peer-to-peer networks (2003, methodology): “Our approach integrates these two previous works [1, 12], and applies them to file sharing system in peer-topeer networks.”
The Beta Reputation System (2002, background): “These range from simple ones which accept numerical values which are simply added together, such as in eBay, to advanced mechanisms which deploy more complex mathematical equations [15, 14, 11, 3, 7, 8].”
Argumentation-based negotiation (2003, unknown): “A more elaborate model of trust could also be incorporated (e.g., Ramchurn et al., 2003a; Sabater and Sierra, 2002).”
Autonomous agents modelling other agents: A comprehensive survey and open problems (2017, background): “Many other proposed methods quantify trust as a continuous value which aggregates various information sources using relative importance weights, conﬁdence values, time discounting, etc. (e.g. Huynh et al., 2006; Mui et al., 2002; Sabater and Sierra, 2001; Schillo et al., 2000).”
Bayesian network-based trust model (2003, methodology): “Sabater and Sierra’s work [11] extends the notion of trust and reputation into social and ontological dimensions.”