Should a Normal Imputation Model be Modified to Impute Skewed Variables

By Paul T. von Hippel. 2013

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Researchers often impute continuous variables under an assumption of normality–yet many incomplete variables are skewed. We find that imputing skewed continuous variables under a normal model can lead to bias. The bias is usually mild for popular estimands such as means, standard deviations, and linear regression coefficients, but the bias can be severe for more shape-dependent estimands such as percentiles or the coefficient of skewness. We test several methods for adapting a normal imputation model to accommodate skewness, including methods that transform, truncate, or censor (round) normally imputed values as well as methods that impute values from a quadratic or truncated regression. None of these modifications reliably reduces the biases of the normal model, and some modifications can make the biases much worse. We conclude that, if one has to impute a skewed variable under a normal model, it is usually safest to do so without modifications–unless you are more interested in estimating percentiles and...

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74b4a31619809c99866760109e00c34ba8830728

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Paul T. von Hippel

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Paul T. von Hippel
  2. Craig K. Enders
  3. T. Macías
  4. A. Jenkins
  5. Kristin Turney
  6. Christina J. Cross
  7. Todd E Bodner
  8. Amanda C. Gottschall

Citations in the corpus