Reconceptualizing Team Identification: New Dimensions and Their Relationship to Intergroup Bias

By J. Dimmock, J. Grove, R. Eklund. 2005

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Citations in the corpus

Identity crisis: a theoretical analysis of ‘team identification’ research (2017, unknown): “…et al., 2002; Fisher & Wakefield, 1998; Lock, Taylor, & Darcy, 2011; Theodorakis, Wann, & Weaver, 2012), the dimensional structure of the construct (Dimmock, Grove, & Eklund, 2005; Heere et al., 2011; Heere & James, 2007a; Lock, Funk, Doyle, & McDonald, 2014), behavioural manifestations of…”
Testing Models of Motives and Points of Attachment among Spectators in College Football (2009, unknown): “Furthermore, researchers have recently started viewing team identification as a multi-dimensional construct (e.g., Dimmock, Grove, & Eklund, 2005; Heere & James, 2007).”
Exploring the development of team identification: the contribution of social identity and the psychological continuum model (2012, unknown): “…of supporters clubs (Crawford, 2003; Funk & James, 2001); knowledge of team history, statistics and players (Funk & Pastore, 2000; Wann & Branscombe, 1995); and negative perceptions of rival teams to clearly define the in-group from relevant out-groups (Dimmock et al., 2005; Wann & Dolan, 1994).”