Dynamic Network Analysis

By Kathleen M. Carley. 2003

315 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/748cb7235fab4de3fec2fa078f6b61d90f95557b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Advancing research on team process dynamics (2015, methodology): “…random coefficient modeling and latent growth modeling (MacCallum & Austin, 2000; McArdle & Nesselroade, 2003; Raudenbush, 2001), network analysis (Carley, 2003; Contractor, Wasserman, & Faust, 2006), and latent vector autoregressive and system dynamics analyses (DeShon, 2012; Hanges & Wang,…”
Multilayer networks (2013, methodology): “Similarly, one can use metamatrices to conduct a dynamic network analysis [77] that incorporates temporal and spatial information, node attributes and types, and other types of data about social networks in the same framework.”
A framework for analysis of dynamic social networks (2006, background): “A more computational view [7] incorporates probabilities and uncertainty into the structure information and combines social network analysis with multi-agent systems.”
On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data (2006, background): “This is particularly true when we study large or covert networks, where the data is likely to be missing or hidden (Carley, 2003).”
Communication Networks from the Enron Email Corpus “It's Always About the People. Enron is no Different” (2005, unknown): “ORA is a dynamic network analysis toolkit for assessing and comparing complex network data that changes over time (Carley, 2003; Carley et al., forthcoming).”
Networks in Political Science: Back to the Future (2011, background): “Increased ttention has also been paid to network dynamics (Carley 2003).”