Opportunistic media access for multirate ad hoc networks

By Bahareh Sadeghi, V. Kanodia, Ashutosh Sabharwal, Edward W. Knightly. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, 2002

787 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74445307a1de5bb7a3563adb17196cb3cbc28b87

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Hari Balakrishnan
2. Robert Morris
3. Sanjit Biswas
4. Kyle Jamieson
5. J. Padhye
6. Guohong Cao
7. Edward W. Knightly
8. Brian Zill

Citations in the corpus

• CARA: Collision-Aware Rate Adaptation for IEEE 802.11 WLANs (2006, background): “Since the 802.11 standard does not specify any algorithm and/or protocol to efficiently utilize the multiple transmission rates, many rate adaptation schemes have been proposed [11]– [13], [15], [18]–[21].”
• End-to-end performance and fairness in multihop wireless backhaul networks (2004, methodology): “In particular, we consider Receiver Based Auto Rate (RBAR) [13] and Oppor­tunistic Auto Rate (OAR) [29].”
• A cautionary perspective on cross-layer design (2005, background): “good [ 11 ]. The idea is to “make more hay while the sun shines.” Every reservation allocates a fixed time”
• Opportunistic routing in multi-hop wireless networks (2004, methodology): “niques with the Opportunistic Auto Rate (OAR) protocol [ 19 ], developed to exploit dura-”
• ExOR: opportunistic multi-hop routing for wireless networks (2005, background): “The Opportunistic Auto Rate (OAR) protocol [17] exploits durations of high quality channel conditions caused by movement.”
• rDCF: A Relay-Enabled Medium Access Control Protocol for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks (2005, methodology): “Similarly to most existing work [9], [21], we apply receiverinitiated channel condition measurement and let the receiver notify the sender of the transmission rate via CTS.”
• PPR: partial packet recovery for wireless networks (2007, background): “Rate selection algorithms have been extensively studied in 802.11 wireless networks [9,18, 28 ].”
• Bit-rate selection in wireless networks (2005, background): “The intuition behind OAR is that channel coherence times typically exceed multiple packet transmission times, and by taking advantage of high link qualities when they appear, channel throughput can be increased.”
• Routing in multi-radio, multi-hop wireless mesh networks (2004, methodology): “Several algorithms such as RBAR [22], and OAR [36] have been proposed.”
• Cross-layer wireless bit rate adaptation (2009, background): “[21] builds on RBAR, opportunistically transmitting back-to-back frames when the channel quality is good.”
• Robust rate adaptation for 802.11 wireless networks (2006, methodology): “Rate adaptation has been an active research topic in recent years and a number of algorithms [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12] have been proposed.”
• Cross-layer design for wireless networks (2003, background): “depending on the “goodness” of user channels in wireless LANs [ 16 ].”
• Idle sense: an optimal access method for high throughput and fairness in rate diverse wireless LANs (2005, methodology): “In the method called Opportunistic Auto Rate,Sadeghi et al. proposed to grant hosts the same temporal-share of channel access as under single-rate 802.11 DCF [ 27 ].”