Gaining from interactions with universities: multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity
By Kate Bishop, Pablo D'Este, Andy Neely. 2008
357 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7433ddf7161d7ac13e4553297fec1cead51c96ac
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Katarzyna Zalewska-Kurek
- Petra C de Weerd-Nederhof
- Isabella Hatak
- Gabriela Dutrenit
- I. Skute
- C. Fuentes
In Political Science and International Relations
In Strategy and Management
- Katarzyna Zalewska-Kurek
- Petra C de Weerd-Nederhof
- Isabella Hatak
- Gabriela Dutrenit
- I. Skute
- C. Fuentes
Citations in the corpus
- Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit (2012, background): “…and Cohen, et al. (2002) regarding the importance of developing new products, and of Zucker et al. (2002), Adams, et al. (2003), Hanel and St-Pierre (2006), Arvanitis, et al. (2008), Eom and Lee (2010) and Bishop et al. (2011) regarding the importance of increasing innovative and R&D capabilities.”
- Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the literature on university–industry collaborations (2017, background): “In recent years, university–industry (U–I) collaborations have garnered substantial interest as a source for knowledge production and new technological advancements, fostering the economic and innovative competitiveness of regions (Bishop et al. 2011; D’Este et al. 2013; Rasmussen and Wright 2015).”
- A Functional Perspective on Learning and Innovation: Investigating the Organization of Absorptive Capacity (2011, neutral): “There has also been greater interest recently in academic sourcing strategies (Bishop et al., 2011).”