Measuring Peer Pressure, Popularity, and Conformity in Adolescent Boys and Girls: Predicting School Performance, Sexual Attitudes, and Substance Abuse

By D. Santor, Deanna L. Messervey, V. Kusumakar. 2000

658 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Qualitative Contributions to Resilience Research (2003, neutral): “Most quantitative studies of peer pressure reify the power of the social group over teenagers, ignoring the personal agency of individuals (see Bauman and Ennett, 1996; Clasen and Brown, 1985; Santor et al., 2000).”
Psychosocial Predictors of Emerging Adults' Risk and Reckless Behaviors (2002, background): “Also in line with past practice (e.g., Arnett, 1996, 1998; Santor et al., 2000 ), the reckless sex subscale included a question relating to the number of sexual partners over the previous year.”
The Role of Social Network Sites in Romantic Relationships: Effects on Jealousy and Relationship Happiness (2011, methodology): “Need for popularity was measured with seven items from the popularity scale by Santor, Messervey, and Kusumakar (2000).”
Sexting, Mobile Porn Use, and Peer Group Dynamics: Boys' and Girls' Self-Perceived Popularity, Need for Popularity, and Perceived Peer Pressure (2014, background): “Peer pressure can also be conceptualized without immediate referral to particular behaviors, however (Santor et al., 2000).”