Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Theory of Mind: A Neural Prediction Problem (2013, positive): “We also found that using spatial pattern analysis in the TPJ, we could decode the difference between innocent and guilty beliefs (Koster-Hale et al., 2013).”
When Mental States Matter, When They Don't, and What That Means for Morality (2013, background): “…in highfunctioning autism is also consistent with a recent fMRI study using the approach of MVPA (described above): in participants with autism, the spatial pattern of neural activity in the RTPJ does not reliably distinguish between intentional and accidental harms (Koster-Hale et al., 2013).”
Deconstructing intent to reconstruct morality (2015, methodology): “This basic method has played a pivotal role in studies of moral reasoning among adults [1–3] and children [4–7] and, more recently, has been used to investigate the neural substrates of moral judgment [8–10] and its disruption in clinical populations [11,12,13 ,14].”